News & Initiatives

What is Impact Investing?

Today, Impact investing is considered to include the pursuit of financial returns at market rates from investments that deliver real world change (or “Impact”), or the pursuit of sound financial investments with positive externalities. This type of Impact Investing, known as “Non-concessionary Impact” Investing, is on the opportunities side of the Sustainable (or “Responsible”, or “ESG”) Investing equation. This contrasts with the more traditional view that Impact investing is “Concessionary” and involves investing for social benefit at the expense of financial outcomes, a view perhaps explained by the origins of Impact in the Social Responsible Investing (“SRI”) movement of previous decades.

Whether or not an Impact investment programme is Non-concessionary or Concessionary depends on the intentions of the investor at the point of taking the decision to invest.  If their minimum acceptable rate of return is driven only by financial risk, i.e., it is same as for a non-Impact investment of similar financial characteristics, then it is Non-concessionary. If, on the other hand, they would apply a lower return hurdle in order to secure their Impact objectives, then it becomes Concessionary. This ex-ante designation is independent of the financial outcome realised and cannot be reinterpreted ex-post:

• A Non-concessionary Impact investment that yields poor financial returns does not become a Concessionary Impact investment; it remains a poor investment, perhaps a potential “lessons-learned” case study; and
• Conversely, a Concessionary Impact investment that yields higher than expected, market rates of financial returns does not become Non-concessionary.

The Global Impact Investing Network (“GIIN”), a global champion of impact investing, defines Impact as “investments made with the intention to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return”¹.

Article 9 of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations refers to “a financial product [that] has sustainable investments as its objective”², and anecdotally, this seems to be widely accepted as capturing Impact Funds.

Realising outcomes, or, extracting the essence

The path to realisation of the financial outcomes of an investment is well-established and almost obvious. Consider an Impact investment that achieves a sound financial return as well as its Impact Objectives.  The sale or redemption of the investments will be accompanied by the investors’ receipt of realisation proceeds; they’ll “see” the money in their bank account.  However, this does not, by itself, enable them to participate in or receive or consume the Impact benefit of their investment.  

The investors’ participation in the Impact outcomes may be necessary for reasons of accountability: they may have represented to a Board or other stakeholders that the investment had a dual purpose, and mere receipt of expected redemption proceeds does not allow them to confirm attainment of the second, Impact-related objective.  The participation may simply comprise the quite legitimate outcome of a feeling of satisfaction that their investment has delivered the real world change they desired.  It may also be much more serious than that: the Impact Objective may be a major strategic objective for the Investor, e.g., the pursuit of Net Zero. 

For an investor to realise the Impact objective from investing in an Impact Fund, the GP of the Fund would need to first identify the potential for Impact and determine appropriate Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) to capture this prior to each investment. These KPIs would be measured at the point of investment, then monitored and tracked throughout the life of the investment up to its realisation³, and reported, with due reliability, to the Investor.

Consider the case of two hypothetical funds, Fund P and Fund Q. They made identical investments on identical financial terms and realised the same financial outcomes.  Their investments had significant Impact in their sphere of activity.  Fund P determined, measured and monitored KPIs which it reported as Impact outcomes to investors, and Fund Q did not⁴. An Investor seeking Impact outcomes would have a rational preference for Fund P, over Fund Q. This would be because Fund P has a track record of facilitating Investors’ participation in the Impact outcomes and Fund Q does not.  In a world where investors may be seeking Impact, subsequent raises may either favour Fund P, or put competitive pressure on Fund Q to report Impact.    

The Future of Impact Reporting

The rise in awareness of Climate Change and Net Zero pledges by many asset owners is one indication of a growing demand for Impact participation by investors.  Asset owners will be seeking investments that help them achieve such real-world objectives (or Impact), and it does not seem unreasonable to expect that demand for Impact strategies (whether or not labelled or marketed as such) will increase.

_{IMPORTANT NOTICE}

_{The information in this White Paper (the “Information”) is for general informational purposes and is being provided to you by an Albourne Group Company. For this purpose, “Albourne Group Company” means Albourne Partners Limited or one of its subsidiaries and affiliates from time to time, including Albourne America LLC, Albourne Partners (Canada) Limited, Albourne Partners Japan, Albourne Partners (Asia) Limited, Albourne Partners (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Albourne Partners (Bermuda) Limited, Albourne Partners Deutschland AG, Albourne Partners (Cyprus) Limited and Albourne Cyprus Limited (such companies being, collectively, the “Albourne Group”). If, in your jurisdiction, it would be unlawful for you to receive the Information, then the Information is not intended for your use. The Information is not provided to and may not be used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction where the provision or use thereof would be contrary to applicable laws, rules or regulations or where any Albourne Group Company is not authorized to provide such Information.}

_{The Albourne Group excludes, to the fullest extent permitted by law, all liability, including any loss or damage (financial or otherwise) that may result directly or indirectly from your or any use of or reliance upon the Information.}

_{Without prejudice to the foregoing, the Information is not, nor should it be construed as, an invitation, inducement, offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction to any person or entity to acquire or dispose of, or to deal in, any security or any interest in any fund, or to engage in any investment activity, nor does it constitute any form of tax or legal advice. The Information does not take into account the particular investment objectives or specific circumstances of any person or entity. For those reasons, the Information in this presentation is for illustrative purposes only and should not be used as the basis of any investment decisions.}

_{This Information may not be reproduced in whole or in part and no part of this material may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise made available to a third party or incorporated into another document or other material or posted to any bulletin board without the prior written consent of an Albourne Group Company.}

_{To the extent any third party service provider is referred to in the Information, you should not necessarily view this as an endorsement by Albourne of such service provider. The Information may also contain information obtained from third parties which may not have been independently verified. The Albourne Group makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Information and disclaims all liability for any loss or damage which may arise directly or indirectly from any use of or reliance upon any such data, forecasts or opinions, or from the Information generally.}