We use necessary cookies to make our website work. We would also like to set analytics cookies,
which we will use to optimize our website and make it more
relevant to your interests. These will be set only if you accept.
These cookies are used for technical reasons and are necessary to enable
our website to operate efficiently, so that you can navigate the website
with ease and use specific features.
If these cookies are blocked or disabled, some of the website may not operate effectively.
We would like to collect website analytics information to help us optimize
the website and make it more relevant to your interests. We collect this data by setting
Analytics cookies on your device, which collect data about how you have interacted with our site.
For more information, please see our
Cookies page
.
You can manage your consent at any time here, or on your
Profile page
Accessibility Menu
Reset All
Welcome to Albourne Insights
On this page prospective Albourne clients can explore a sample of
the latest investment content Albourne has created for its client base.
If you work for a Pension, Endowment & Foundation, Financial Institution,
Family Office or Insurance Company please request access. This page enables
you to attend our webinars, read research blogs, papers and presentations,
listen to podcasts and films, download bespoke reports and sign up to newsletters.
Access to this page is not available to the media,
fund managers and broader industry participants.
What is the reason that Multi-Strategy Hedge Funds are so popular?
Can they keep being an ever-increasing part of the overall Hedge Fund market?
What is netting risk and what does it mean for the structure of the fund and manager behavior?
What does the compensation system mean for investors and fund managers?
Ronan discusses key considerations, including:
It is important to remember that when there are performance fees involved, diversification is no longer a free lunch. The cost to diversify is called netting risk.
Typically, Multi-Strategy funds present investors with a choice between a focus on talent and structure.
A structural focus on risk management and investment process means that PMs are made to produce risk and returns that suit the overall portfolio and not maximize their own payoff.
A focus on talent tends to let PMs maximize their own utility, often at the expense of maximizing their use to the overall portfolio.